I was always so
lovelessly, fundamentally alienated from my parents – linked to mother only by
anxiety and child’s dependency and to father not at all – that to this day it
aggravates me to see adults who are still regressively grafted to bad parents.
I know it’s the rarest person who can be helped to grow up and have real
separation. I’m not asking for real growth. Just the desperation, cussedness,
strength to break the cord and walk away, at least to a safe distance. That kind of strength will prove to
be profound: It’s not just saying superficially “no” or “goodbye” or “these are
my rules.” It echoes deep into one’s history to show the complete loss that has
always been there.
I’m guessing
that most therapy condones this weakening, disease-producing bond. After all,
they are your parents and you love them. To me this only means that “love” can
have warped meanings that keep all the different pathological people afloat. Does
every baby or infant have, by nature, love for the mother and father before
abuse and other realities submerge it? There’s no reason to believe it. But
even if it does exist as a substrate, is it right or best to revert to that bedrock,
to undo all your hard-won growing up in order to keep that childlike feeling of
oneness?
I, personally,
would like to have had parents I could care about, love, look up to. But I am
proof that one can have other values, other people, and live forward while
still being living grief.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are welcome, but I'd suggest you first read "Feeling-centered therapy" and "Ocean and boat" for a basic introduction to my kind of theory and therapy.