Saturday, September 29, 2018

Traveling Shrink's Micro-Therapy


When I’m too old to be tolerated at any mental health agency or counseling practice, I will wander, with my Travel Nurse wife, about the states (requisite licenses in pocket) and offer two- or three-session micro-therapy, a pressure-formed, organic creation of mine. It came into being nineteen years ago when I worked at a twenty-four-hour crisis center, weekends midnight to noon. There, acutely troubled people would come in alone; policemen and psychologists* with their nihilistic and juvenile detention  and high heels-wearing sons; families with psychotic Somali mothers who’d chew the plastic seats off the chairs; suicidal folks “medically cleared” by the hospital nine-tenths of a mile down the road, obnoxious Borderlines and lonely masturbation addicts. My process developed mostly with the sane and serious clients who would often be sent to a hospital psychiatric unit if I were not able to facilitate some relief and resolution. This would happen – not infrequently, really – in an hour or two, sometimes three. Understand that crisis intervention in facilities such as this would generally consist of a twenty- or thirty-minute face-to-face with clinician completing the Intake paperwork, determining lethality (most suicidal, very few homicidal), offering warm assurances, and sending the person home or to family, or to one of our overnight rooms with a bolted-down cot, or to the CSU (crisis stabilization unit: attached annex with beds, tv, food and activities), or to the mentioned psych unit. I don’t recall why I was always allowed to luxuriate in lengthy client interactions, though it must have been mostly because the graveyard shift was quieter, and shift leaders knew I was the in-house “Sigmund Fred.”

You take the knowledge of abyssal, childhood-based innumerable human pains and their natural but difficult healing found in the Primal Therapy literature; share it with the client in the four-dimensional empathy which that knowledge engenders; sink into the instant “presenting problem” and its history; engage in that feeling-centered process in an attenuated way; add a little personality and fifty pounds of listening in a two-pound bag; find some real but admittedly cultured optimism (which may include social-worky factors like community resources, literature); say words that tell him he is not alone: you are here; add self-disclosure of imperfection and troubles when poignant. Be earnestness, warmth and circumspect humor; and the client’s suicidal or otherwise terrible knot loosens, maybe unties. He feels better, brighter. Soon after, he may leave with the sense that someone sees and knows some deep part of him even when he’s alone in his apartment or going about his next day in his struggles. I honestly believe we can send someone out there no longer feeling quite so alone.

A problem presented when in subsequent therapy jobs I found myself almost unable not to work in this fashion. What should have been the extended process of brief or long-term therapy was too pregnant, too alpha and omega squeezed into a dramatic, opening-up but possibly disquieting encounter. This may seem wrong on its face: The clients were not in crisis, at least not in the same sense the earlier ones were. Yet, I felt that essentially there was no difference between the crisis moment and the crisis life: those who sensed a wrongness about their very existence and needed some immediate assurance, immediate saving. (Later, I realized it was my own insecurity that made me telescope everything.)

I learned to foster in therapy a relationship. And of course to recognize the client’s need to hide for a while – sometimes a long while – before she could trust. Weekly therapy is more in accord with life. We need company. We need that extra lower level of existential seriousness that at first just punctuates our normal days, then disturbs them, then changes them.

There will always be individuals ready for something fast, edifying, or different from the therapy they had in the past. By then, in my mid-seventies, I’ll be confident enough to feel I can help them in three non-crisis sessions.

- - - - - - - - - - -

* These professionals’ children are always troubled.

Thursday, September 27, 2018

When he was 17*


It’s said (and probably written) that psychopaths can sometimes “burn out” – stop committing crimes, serial killing, as they age. But they don’t grow a heart in their middle or golden years, any deep wellspring of compassion or love of life. I’ve heard the same of virulent Borderlines. Maybe in their sixties, they stop ripping their hair out if their lunch date is twenty minutes late; stop slashing their arms if their therapist cancels a session; stop locking themselves in the bathroom with suicidal drama because they hate you this minute. But they do not retrofit a core of emotional stability and solid sense of self. Ash just drifts over the embers, which continue to burn. It is almost impossible to not be the person you were at 17. Your character – meaning for the most part your genetics and your holistic armor of defenses and your painful feelings that will grow flowcharts and smorgasbords of congruent ideas and belief systems – is established. This is because it got you through your childhood which, I am sorry to say, was often hell, as Bettelheim specified** (and I generalize). Your character became your survival self. Not only is it intransigent. Who would want to reverse it and become a regressed, shell-less egg, become “not-me”?

There are two serious ways to be different from that forged-in-fire self. One is to capitalize on some ingrained decent, pro-life sense or feeling – a kernel or potential from birth, let’s say – and brute-force that better self against the universe-sized undertow of the past. One can manufacture a better person. But there will now be a deeper, subversive depression, and there will be sickness, physical illness. There will be completely unpredictable urges to veer off-track, to self-medication or to annihilation. You cannot think or force away your pain and its savior character.

The other way to be different is to heal some essence, which can only mean to regress to the earliest, formative poisons, be them again, and this time let them out. A high school senior and college student who loves to drink a hundred kegs; who has such a burnt and angry part of his heart that he sees young women as pulverizable meat; who apparently sees the law as an arbitrary code he can arbitrarily manipulate; and who lies now in primitive and unbelievable ways – has pain deeper than he knows, and a defense character he does not want to change.

Brett Kavanaugh has failed the serious ways of growth. He has no business wearing the robe.

- - - - - - - - - - -

* https://www.brownanddana.com/listen. “It Was a Very Good Year,” Brown and Dana, 1963.

** Bruno Bettelheim: “I speak here of the child’s private world . . . Each of us is implying in his way that one cannot help another in his ascent from hell unless one has first joined him there. . . .” The Empty Fortress, 1967, p. 10.

Sunday, September 23, 2018

Personality disorder test


This article is an elaboration of my comment to Maureen Dowd’s NYT article, “Sick to Your Stomach? #MeToo.”

“A personality disorder can be defined as the global, seamless emotionalized attitude or belief system that encases and protects a person who failed the psycho-developmental stages of progressive maturity. This definition would apply to Narcissistic Personality, Borderline, Antisocial, Schizotypal, Dependent Personality and the rest. It would probably also apply to most of the senators who have pre-judged Dr. Christine Blasey Ford and who will doubt her on Thursday. Their ideas are caused by emotion, and their emotion is the salve on their failure to be fully grown, mature human beings with normal moral feeling. That may sound drastic, but I'd bet my next ten years' salary on it.”
Maybe it would deflate people’s sense of moment and horror to consider that Personality Disorder may not be the exotic specialty of this “troglodyte” (Ms. Dowd’s term) president, but could be legion among politicians. Politicians – men and women who want power to take from the anonymous masses; who are guided by big, cloudy systems of heterogeneous positions united only by a “Left” or “Right” mood; whose thinking is not guided and turned by reality but whose reality is pre-established in their feeling.

Many years ago, a little innocent in my field, I read with surprise a psychologist’s statement that “most families are dysfunctional.” These days, most people seem to know that. I’d like now to propose a possibly unexpected fact – that personality disorder is pandemic, as terrible as it may seem for a person to grow into a self-protective universe of developmental arrest and escapist, homeostatic ideas and emotions.

We see it all the time, that family and friends, famous and poor, blowhards on bar stools and highbrows in universities speak their loud wisdom not from their long trials in the wilderness, not from considering a horizon of possibilities with ignorance and dispassion, but from templates forged in their childhood and adolescence. Why do we give credence to these frozen embryos and infants with their adamantine platforms, conspiracy theories, global prejudices? Why does a single person accept Tomi Lahren or Steve Bannon or Theodore J. Kaczynski or Donald Trump to be a considerable human being and not the bent delusion program they are?

How can we determine who among us is the skewed and out-of-time world of a personality disorder? (Setting aside whether there is a good purpose in doing so.) Many times, it is obvious. Someone we hear broadcasts his belief, his certainty, day in and day out, that seems intangible and oddly scented. This is because it is not an idea so much as it is his need. It cannot be tested. Bannon’s belief in “saecula” and “a cataclysmic event that destroys the old order and brings in a new one in a trial of fire.”* A Narcissist’s certainty of his unique specialness and perfection. A televangelist whose voice is rabid and whose doctrine is booming; while a parishioner’s, in a different church, are not. Often, though, it is not visible or audible. Some writers believe that President Obama is a Narcissist, though canny enough to hide it, to appear genuinely good and empathic. Trump, stupider and impulsive, can only pull himself an inch away from stating “I am perfect!”, though “Nobody knows the system better than me, which is why I alone can fix it”** lurched very close to godliness.

Maybe the best approach is to look inside. Do you feel, in a perversely honest moment, there is something about your belief, your certain conviction, that disembodies you, sets you apart from the world? Do you need the belief, the felt rightness of it, or are you grounded in reality without it? A scientist creates a theory, accepts it and values it. Possibly his theory holds for ten or twenty years, but then is disproven by other experimenters. He accepts that, and moves on. He is jazzed by the universe. He still exists whether he is right or wrong.

See if you still exist without your idea.

- - - - - - - - - - -