A Trump
supporter at a rally or in the voting booth triggers my strong disgust and
contempt. Trump supporters on my office couch inspire different feelings: mild distaste,
or wonder or weary resignation, or caring acceptance of the person’s
complexity. Client status meat-tenderizes the caricature.
I saw one
middle-aged man for a little over a year. He had survived more traumas – quantity-wise
and often quality-wise – than any ten clients I’d known, and this includes
those whose daily “prison life” qualified them for the dreadful Complex
Post-Traumatic Stress diagnosis. He was the best client I’ve ever had in his
ability to heal by outletting pain direct from the depth of its original childhood
home, not refined through the here-and-now filter that displaces most people’s
feeling expression. He loved me, believing I had opened him up to this deep healing,
when in fact I mostly sat mute, stupid and stunned before his devil-given
photographic memory of every rape, starvation, pet murder and scum character he
had experienced or witnessed daily for fourteen years. So he had me to cling
to, but much more than that, his young son, the fiery love of his life. Picture
a future shocking newspaper headline of a mass shooter. He was not that, but I
assumed he would be if anything were to happen to his boy.
A year into
therapy, I was surprised and, admittedly, un-therapeutically-manned when he showed
me his new dating profile that included this proviso: The woman “must love
Trump.” This much respect for me, who he knew had a different politics? This
capacity for gratitude to therapy and God? This beautiful fathering – kind, patient,
generous, the opposite of everything he had lived growing up? How could he feel
right about the narcissistic, sociopathic, cruel, dogmatic and dim president?
I remembered an
earlier client. He, too, manifested something akin to what biologists call “saltation,”
a sudden evolution. Both had been raised in war zones by immoral, sociopathic,
failed mothers and fathers. Both were forged to be angry and predatory survival
machines from their beginning, had lived criminal lives through their teens, twenties
and thirties, and then – changed, turned one-hundred-eighty degrees. In
session, the one bawled his pain, his regrets, his abject dedication to a cold and
cheating wife. The other, who had for a time been wealthy by criminal brilliance and the
energy of a thousand swallowed traumas, joined the world of workers and fathers
with dreams and futures.
What is deeper
inside people? What was deeper in my client who could love, but who appreciated,
in this president, character features he had wanted to kill in his father? Therapy
with its week after week, month after month of continual white-hot upsurging of
devastation, didn’t reach everything. I think I might have needed to hug my
client, be a good father. Without that, could he really descend to the infant,
the toddler, the little boy melting away his grief in someone’s arms? Without
that, did there remain the solitary boy who could never feel healing love?
Therapists –
not those who resort to EMDR with its “installation” of nice thoughts – refer
to trauma reliving: returning to the original event and this time not freezing
but purging everything. But if there’s going to be reliving, maybe it has to go
all the way,* not just to the loss but to the need, the one healing environment
of the babe-in-arms,** the parent who cares.
- - - - - - - -
- - -
* Bukowski, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k6_QUhUPrF4.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are welcome, but I'd suggest you first read "Feeling-centered therapy" and "Ocean and boat" for a basic introduction to my kind of theory and therapy.