My experience
is probably no surprise to any feeling-centered depth therapist, but I want to
mention it as I’ve had two worthy moments in two sessions in two days. A
twenty-seven-year-old man and a twenty-seven-year-old woman. Both presented as
opaque, one appearing not to have, one denying, any depth (“there is no
‘child’ in me”). The man actually looked intellectually deficient, with his flat mannequin
expression, surface sentences and dully watchful manner. The woman, bright
(studying physics in grad school), chatted nicely but kept her frozen smile and
anxiety on guard, to prevent any entrée to her feelings.
This is not to
say they were emotionally mute. Anger and anxiety were their “presenting
problems,” and they could describe basic symptoms and a narrative history.
It was time to
bludgeon them in order to forestall any more time wasted in sessions. I
mentioned the Focusing process, described in an earlier session, to “subliminally”
attune them to the feeling zone. Then I asked them to sit back or lie back,
eyes closed, and dwell inward, letting any feeling coalesce. Sit in it for a while.
Then (after some untimed silence), make a doorway that lets the feeling come up
and out in words. Both clients complied and sat back in complete silence for a
long time, five or more minutes. Somehow that was all it took to enable them to
fall into a never-known place. The man talked to his parents about their killing
him with rejection immediately upon their divorce. He then talked to his wife
about his sense of failure and his failure to her. I could see he was in an
almost-hypnotic place, and at the sweet-spot perfectly gifted moment when he
had painted the doom he was giving his family, I suggested he tell her what he
can do “instead.” He spoke words to save himself: what he would do now to
change, what he would do for them. It was actually thrilling to witness it.
The woman,
after her period of silence, lost her guard and said to no one how she had
fucked up her life and how it has taken all these years to create some solidity.
She decried that her mother had never been a strong and wise resource for her.
She told her how desolate it had been when she graduated from high school and
there was no parent “to tell me what to do,” what to do in college or with her
life. Afterwards, we understood how regressive this was, she still was, the
child needing to be told. Something she had never realized.
Though I’ve
done a hundred similar processes over the years, somehow I don’t recall doing
this simple one much at all. But it’s probably the right way to go, maybe most
of the time. No subject of the hour. Just go inside, close your eyes, sink, and
stay there for a long time until your real life finds you.
Honing the idea
a little:
A few years ago
I wrote a post (https://pessimisticshrink.blogspot.com/2016/01/theres-no-place-like-home.html)
proposing that the deepest and most moving therapy could be based on the client’s
questioning himself: Who am I? He
“would
sink into the question miles deep, in head silence, before letting a response
emerge. This is because we can read the pieces of our real self – all the
elusive and quiddity truths of it – by presenting the body with open-ended
questions. ‘Who am I?’ ‘How is my life going right now?’ ‘What do I care about?’
‘What does “care” mean to me?’ The body knows – because it owns – the infinitude
of historical feelings that make the facts, far more than our idea-generating,
safe-guessing head knows what’s ultimately real.”
But now I
believe even that is too much of an agenda. Start with nothing, only a place of
comfortable discomfort, and with all the time in the world. (Or so it comes to
seem.)
A second
honing:
An hour of
mostly silence can be vastly superior to half a year of talk.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are welcome, but I'd suggest you first read "Feeling-centered therapy" and "Ocean and boat" for a basic introduction to my kind of theory and therapy.