It took most of
a session, but I eventually proved to my 16-year-old client that she has always
been unheard in her family. To therapy, she brought the problems of insecurity
and fear of displeasing anyone, with an undercurrent of vindictive anger.
(Along with these was a growing global pessimism, but this wasn’t a “presenting”
issue.) The psychoeducation was impelled by her belief that she had already obtained
healing justice with her parents and could continue to get it, through naming
her grievances and anger to them. With parents thus removed as a cause or factor, her
disabilities must come from other sources.
What this
teenager didn’t know is that the home atmosphere remains hypnotic from cradle
to grave; parents’ eyes may never open to their child’s separate personhood; her
upset and grievances cannot really be accepted in a culturally moralistic or
religious home. What she didn’t know is that the past doesn’t heal through
present expression: Early pain requires regression to reach it.
Adult clients say
that they were able to stand up to their parents at some fiery moment in their teen
years. That’s when they voiced their anger at unfairness. What they would not let
themselves know was that this was effete or worse: Brief storms, little fires
of attitude generally reinforced her impotence because mom didn’t care or dad didn’t
want to hear it; there were punishments; and teens are still children.
What she didn’t
know is that all the days of the past, not healed, folded under moments of unreceived
catharsis in the present, forge the character of the future.
I wonder: Do therapists think it makes any sense to show young people such a truth? I
don’t know what the majority do, but discussions with some therapists lead me
to suspect that adolescent work becomes hollow if it is future-oriented with a cognitive approach. I believe it is generally palliative of a terminal disease
– death by parental lack of empathy – that hasn’t happened yet.
What, if not to
reveal the parent’s flaw, is the best answer? Let her continue to think she is defective?
Let her blame teachers and disloyal friends? Help her force skills and optimism
upon a foundation of unresolution? Let her continue to think her parents are “doing
the best they can”? The answer is there is no answer. Teens are in the twilight
zone where they can’t grieve loss of caregivers, who are still the fountainhead.
Even mother’s or father’s epiphanic transformation would be too late to redo their
child. I recently saw a 22-year-old who sat stunned through the second half
of a session when he realized he was right to hate yet also love and need his
mother. Teens are a few years premature to that capacity.