It has occurred
to me that the partners in the dysfunctional marriages I’ve seen exist in a dissociated
state. They have never been present, seeing and being in the moment. They live in
a childhood cloud of wounds and need through which they see a plausible then
actual partner. Now, most people exist on some plateau of repression and
dissociation above their past. When they couple, two processes are set in place.
First, their atavistic need for symbiosis, love and wholeness emerges from
dormancy. They see the other as a golden aura, as manna, her flaws are benefits, are even winsome. Second, after mundane reality dilutes the chemical rush of this childhood hope, and immediately
upon the partner’s committing even the smallest act of disappointment, he sees
her as the embodiment of injustice and ingratitude, the failed need-meeter. “Before and after,” he looks through the translucent mirror of himself.
To break the
dissociation is nearly impossible to do by applying relational techniques such
as Hendrix’s Imago Dialogue,* re-romanticizing and the like, or Gottman’s “antidotes”
to the “Four Horsemen” (criticism, contempt, defensiveness, stonewalling). The
dissociation is not in the relationship. It is in the individual. One must have
him look to his own childhood needs never met, her own pain never addressed – go
deep to tears, epiphany, resolution. Only that can break the adult’s trance and
enable him to see his partner as a flawed but lovable person rather than as his
life’s need-meeter.
- - - - - - - -
- - -
* Hendrix’s
Dialogue, unlike Gottman’s very superficial approaches, does include the
potential for “inner child” work. With the “Is
there more?” extension of the Mirroring step, a partner may go deep within
her grievance to find historical antecedents, pain and unmet needs. But I think
it’s unrealistic to expect one partner to become the other’s therapy patient at
the length and depth required to undermine the powerful, lifelong dissociation
defense. That requires individual therapy.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are welcome, but I'd suggest you first read "Feeling-centered therapy" and "Ocean and boat" for a basic introduction to my kind of theory and therapy.