I wondered if I had anything new to say about the Las Vegas shooter. I do feel it’s too soon to try to generate an authoritative diagnostic opinion, as more facts continue to come out. (Just today, some tv profiler said that Paddock liked to tie up prostitutes and ‘make them scream,’ that he was a 9/11 conspiracy theorist, and that he ‘liked to take credit’ for his father’s crimes, whatever that means.) And facts – more and more and detailed ones – are critical in actual, as opposed to DSM-5 Manual, diagnosis.
So for now I’d
just like to say that it’s fine if the shooter didn’t state a reason for his
atrocity, didn’t leave a manifesto, hadn’t joined one of the ideological hate
clubs. Because any explanation of those sorts would be no different from what
any troubled person in therapy offers as his understanding of his problem or
behavior: It would be a rationalization, an intellectualization, a cognitive escape
or cover over the real motivation.
Which is a
feeling. A complex feeling that either finds its right causes or cleaves to the wrong ones.
A client says, “I
don’t like people. You can’t trust anyone.” Though he’ll pay lip service to making
an exception for the therapist, he really does feel a general angry frightened
alienation. But he is wrong. He dislikes people because he was, forty years
earlier, an inconvenience to his partying mom, a complete nothing to his absent
father. No one ever gave him reparative love, and he had to close the wound by
killing hope. He won’t know this without therapy – and honesty.
A “white supremacist”
speaks of his own superiority when it’s crystal clear in therapy that he has
never had a good feeling about himself in his life. Maybe a grandfather gave
him some time, the only non-punitive attention he got. But a baseline pain lived
beneath that. Why couldn’t grandpa’s attention heal that? Because it didn’t
address it. Later, he needed his mere existence, not his accomplishments, to be
important – his whiteness – just as a child actually does need his value to be
a given to his parents: They love him simply because he exists. But the client
won’t know he’s just a child wanting to be loved for who he is.
Paddock does
seem somewhat Asperger’s-like with his adolescent-stage lack of social harmony,
his penchant for numbers and detail. He seems Schizoid: the glassy eyes and
isolative affect in his junior high school photo, his apparent lack of a need
for affiliation. He may have been born a psychopath, one of those “callous and
unemotional” children* like the “bad seed” in the 1956 movie.** All these “types”
can be understood to be based in loss of emotional connection, needful
connection whose starvation causes pain.
Look at pain.
It has different natures in different early environments. If it came in hellish
birth trauma – being born in crack cocaine withdrawal and screaming for six
months*** – any capacity for bond will be burned away. If it was less deadly,
was succored soon after birth by a loving, not-solipsistic mother, it may flow
deep beneath a bountiful land and emerge only during moments of quiet or loss
later in life. If pain strikes and accumulates in childhood, we will have so
many of our clients who try, then sabotage themselves; need love, fall into
unloving relationships; feel hopes and dreams, and watch them evaporate before
their eyes; be caring, but then coarse and rejecting.
I suspect the
shooter’s end-of-life script was his birth template: some trauma that killed
his heart but drove him on, like Janov’s “sympath”**** character. He was “soul
murdered”***** at the starting gate. With no strand of bond, or maybe a vagrant
molecule of it, he would not see people as hearts but as bodies that are both impertinences
and appurtenances. And as he drifted into old age, that necessary quiet, he’d
feel the worst possible pain: what he never had but which other people do: love
and humanity.
Kill it, before
you die from it.
- - - - - - - -
- - -
* http://healthland.time.com/2013/05/07/psychopaths-callous-children-show-dysfunctional-brain-responses-to-people-in-pain/,
and other links and youtube videos.
*** The history
of an eleven-year-old psychopath I treated.
**** http://cigognenews.blogspot.com/search?q=sympath.
Excerpt from "Janov's Reflections on the Human Condition" blog:
“What
we have found is that very early events in life determine the settings of our nervous
systems. What sways the two key nervous systems – both under the aegis of the
hypothalamus – is the kind of biologic and neurologic reaction that is forced
on us and our brains while under specific kinds of threats very early in life,
during gestation and birth. There is the struggle-and-succeed syndrome, the sympath,
and the struggle-and-fail syndrome, the parasympath. This latter gives up
easily and smells failure. Not so the sympath who tries and tries and does not
give up. And when a new patient struggles to feel even when he is not ready, we
generally have a sympath on our hands. The parasympath comes in listless, down
regulated, worn out, unmotivated and depressed. He sees no point in anything.
This is where the therapist needs his full capacity to meet the challenge.
Should he be encouraged? These are the questions we take up constantly in our
staff meetings. We often bring the patient in and ask him what works. He
sometimes knows and sometimes does not. With long-time patients I ask them if I
made a mistake and what was it? I get good answers and I learn.”
*****
There are two or more books with this title. I’ve read Shengold’s -- https://books.google.com/books/about/Soul_Murder.html?id=pBRBAQAAIAAJ.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are welcome, but I'd suggest you first read "Feeling-centered therapy" and "Ocean and boat" for a basic introduction to my kind of theory and therapy.