What should we like?
* Small
children are jazzed by, stuck on, the phenomena around them. Old people are
moved not by the world but by their thoughts of it. They are inner-dwelling
even though they talk about things. Their landscape is memory and the
philosophy their body has produced. Imagine the opposite: Lying on your death
bed and becoming preoccupied with some unfamiliar insect crawling on the sheet,
you lose your last three minutes on earth and are gone. It seems like the most ludicrous
waste, the comedy of death by banana peel. Yet new experience – a bug, a grass
blade whistle, a sliver of a moon – is the meaning of life for the child.*
Is it bad or
good that we gain a self but lose the world along the way?
* Following all
the politics and pundits today is a substitute for being alive. We have become
“social metaphysicians,”** Nathaniel Brandon’s term for individuals whose
ground is other people not the ground itself. We are built into the attitudes
and delusions of movements and alarms, not personal loves or creativity. I saw the
embodiment of that in a twenty-year-old girl (it must be said) who lived on the
bobbing heads of friends, false friends, acquaintances of friends, gossip and
fears of opinions. She didn’t see herself apart from them. Ambition, absorption
in an object, doing something with her life, had never entered the scene. Maybe
the youngest children are a healthy blend of realms. Saturday morning – plans
on what to do; afternoon, they’re playing ball or swimming, nighttime they’re
catching and inspecting lightning bugs. At school, they are learning the world
they are in abstractly; recess, they are swimming in the hive of community,
personal prestige, victories with and against others.
Is there some
right point on our timeline when we should have finished picking up tools and
started building something? Or, stopped being mesmerized and started being
galvanized? People who want to only study and get more learnèd, people who want
to read and read and collect books, knead thoughts into pies in the sky –
something is wrong with them. I really wonder: If you’re living in ideas, are
you really living?
New elevator speech
I always continue
to try to be a better therapist. Part of this urge is, admittedly, my fear that
there are either some elemental truths or some next-evolve insight of
therapeutic relating that I consistently miss. For years I have oriented new
clients to what might be called “injury psychotherapy”: The deepest and most
enduring help comes from finding the poisoned roots of our dysfunction and
getting the poison out. This is done through knowing, expressing the internal,
sending it to the perpetrators, cutting the umbilical cord to them. These
processes make us be less poisoned and feel different, and that means we’re a
different person.
But this speech
doesn’t address the close, caring, even parental and loving relationship that
actually becomes the atmosphere and yes, often the fallback of therapy. Is there a
way to incorporate that into my basic
introduction to – pardon the hubris – their soul?
The client has
described some of “what ails.”*** I’ve asked several or many questions. Then –
I
hope you’ll come to see me as a different kind of friend. That’s because
therapy helps when it’s a different kind of natural: a truth-finding and
truth-sharing beyond where people normally go. All the things you have never
said but needed to; all the feelings you kept inside and didn’t get to live and
breathe; the past lost or never known, the now you’re afraid to say: All that
is good and right here. The one predetermined part of this endeavor is that
you’d need to decide it’s important to you. I’ve seen people do not nearly as
well if they just come on a lark, here and there, or when some troubling
feeling presses them. I really think therapy should be a meaningful part of
your life.
I might try
that speech.
What should we like? part
2
It’s possible
that the best way for the old man to spend his last three minutes is to watch that insect. He began in the
world, and ended in the world.
- - - - - - - -
- - -
* I mean, in an
atmosphere of love. If love is missing, it will be a prepotent need that
blanches or kills interest in worldly things.
** Nathaniel
Brandon – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OmQAnVh6K-4,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NKfESlnzUjc.
*** Probably in
the popular Love’s Executioner, Yalom
says that “What ails?” is his opening question to the new client.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are welcome, but I'd suggest you first read "Feeling-centered therapy" and "Ocean and boat" for a basic introduction to my kind of theory and therapy.