Attention!
David Brooks* is the archetype of the person who believes he lives primarily and
essentially on the ground of ideas, of thought; who believes that knowledge and
life lessons are what actually motivate us, rather than our history-planted inner feelings and sensations.
Such a sad, ignorant delusion! Picture yourself in the “good drowning” of the
beginning and romancing phase of a relationship. There is often a combination
of inebriation and delusion, where your true inner self is washed away by a
golden wave and you find yourself living and sending out the energy of your
unreal, hoped-for, fantasy best. You become powerful and moving, happy, deep,
funny, leap-walk against gravity as on the moon, with winsome peremptory
energy. You are no longer – right then – aware of your more in-the-dirt baseline
of irritability or depression, your childhood drag, and won’t be until after
the commitment phase. The world is wonderful, she (or
he) is your manna. It may have occurred to you, most fleetingly, that you had long
been starved, because now you are filled: All your needs from birth to now are
met.
By the light of Le Brooks, will you, in
that place, be superimposing Jane Austen’s antiquated polished perceptiveness upon
the face and character of your new partner? Considering pro’s and con’s of
desirability from English 101? Let us for God’s sake hope not. You would be a
ventriloquist’s dummy, a program, a severed head. Pathetic, deplorable,
brainwashed intellectuals!
- - - - - - - -
- - -
* “The biggest
way most colleges fail is this: They don’t plant the intellectual and moral
seeds students are going to need later, when they get hit by the vicissitudes
of life. If you didn’t study Jane Austen while you were here, you probably lack
the capacity to think clearly about making a marriage decision. If you didn’t
read George Eliot, then you missed a master class on how to judge people’s
character. If you didn’t read Nietzsche, you are probably unprepared to handle
the complexities of atheism—and if you didn’t read Augustine and Kierkegaard,
you’re probably unprepared to handle the complexities of faith.” https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/05/commencement-address-too-honest-have-been-delivered-person/611572/.
I have a big problem with thinking. There is just so much wrong with it. Clients with no good ideas – chronic worrisome, poisoned thoughts with no value but to enervate. Grotesque reductionism of complex feelings and needs: “I have a right to know everything and control my daughter’s life: I’m her mother.” The pseudo-reality of ideas, always ipso facto seeming to have a veneer of legitimacy, yet they’re the convoluted metamorphic stuff, debris and mountains, first thrown up from our underground magma – the body’s historical feeling. If you really want to know Self, shut down your thinking and feel the surge and the sludge beneath. You won’t find prejudice – racial or gender hatred; or simple labels like depression or anger or Borderline. You won’t find your philosophical mission statement or religious obduracy. You won’t find intellectualized disregard of your daughter’s personhood – the raison d’ĂȘtre of one client’s mother’s blog. You won’t find the “guilt” so many people claim from their childhood roots, because the feeling knows you did nothing wrong, that “guilt” was your parents’ cruel words and your accepting them because you needed love, because a six-year-old – if she has a chance at all – can’t reject her parents.
What you will find is heavy, foundational feeling states from childhood, and if you have a drill and a microscope, even deeper ones from a toddler’s or infant’s life. You will find adolescent or adult fusion-feelings – lighter but more dramatic – evolved from the earlier ones, because you’re not a different person from your child.
I’ll admit
that it’s old age and ripened neurosis that have made me so weary of the
constant diarrhea flow of thoughts that people spout day to day, year to year,
generation to generation. All this helium! Regal political flatulence. Religious reframing of murder. Eight-hundred-page novels about people who would need therapy to know themselves. The world of popcorn heads floats
away into the timeless sky, forever. And all the “racing” thoughts that circle in
the head, infesting anxious or cognitive people.
Watching a
client, I sometimes see his thinking itself
as the problem: long-winded soliloquies full of “I guess” or “I’m probably”
or “maybe it’s” or “I keep getting suspended because I’m impulsive because I’m
ADHD” – utterly meaningless fudge, a floating Disney World. I want to – and sometimes do – say “Stop! Stop generating these thoughts. Find your body.” People live on the wordy top
floor of their tower. Well below them is
their ground, and below that the basement, then the dungeon. They may sense
that where they stand or run is not the ground, but thought is the only
flashlight they wield to look beneath them.
So what that
we can’t – or shouldn’t – reach the bottom, the chains lying at our foundation?
Living in the clouds is poison, too. My feeling is the deeper we go, the more
gravity of ourselves we feel. We re-own our substance, remember and reclaim our
utter unique. I wonder how many people remember that person.
A former client, thirteen years back, emailed me in response to this post (“Thoughting”). She gave me permission to cite the first paragraph of her comment, which I want to do as it includes an insight or two that I hadn’t thought of. -- TPS
ReplyDelete“I totally agree with you about the thoughts aspect of our existence. Most of us live almost entirely in our heads, which are mostly ruled by our egos. Our egos love drama and fear and either feeling less than or more than others. The feelings are where it’s at. If we truly allow ourselves to feel them, they don’t lie. Those thoughts which endlessly parade through our brains, usually produce more pain than just facing the pain in the first place. I believe feelings are (if we are in touch with them), the real messengers.”